Analyze Example: AT610 (-s -m)
This page documents a full analysis example driven by a custom problem file and includes the extracted tables from the generated Excel summary.
Note: Table values are rounded to 4 significant figures for readability. Very small/large values use scientific notation. Refer to the linked Excel/JSON artifacts for full precision.
Note: Advanced solver diagnostics (for example lsf_mult and bnds_mult Lagrange multipliers) are listed in the Excel/JSON artifacts and are intentionally omitted from the tables below for readability.
Run Context
Problem module:
problems/AT610Problem.py
Recorded result set:
results/2026-03-15/14-26-51/AT610-5abe5.xlsxresults/2026-03-15/14-26-51/AT610-5abe5.jsonresults/2026-03-15/14-26-51/profile-5abe5.yaml
For your own runs, use the same naming pattern under a different timestamped folder:
results/<YYYY-MM-DD>/<HH-MM-SS>/<ProblemName>-<suffix>.xlsxresults/<YYYY-MM-DD>/<HH-MM-SS>/<ProblemName>-<suffix>.jsonresults/<YYYY-MM-DD>/<HH-MM-SS>/profile-<suffix>.yaml
Note: <YYYY-MM-DD>/<HH-MM-SS> and <suffix> are generated per run and will differ on your machine.
Profile and run mode from saved profile:
- Profile used:
default run_type: analyzeinclude_sorm: trueinclude_mc: truemc_with_is: false
Results path/ID convention used in this example:
- Results are saved under
results/<YYYY-MM-DD>/<HH-MM-SS>/(date and time subfolders). - Each run gets a new random request ID, so the exact ID changes every time the analysis is run.
- Output files include the last 5 digits of that request ID in their names.
Equivalent command shape:
python -m reliafy analyze <profile> -s -m
Option meaning in this command:
-senables SORM (second-order reliability analysis).-menables Monte Carlo simulation.
Profile Customization
This example uses the default profile, but these options are configurable. See ../profile-reference.md.
- SORM behavior:
reliability_options.sor_method,sor_approximation,sor_fit_method,sor_fdm. - Monte Carlo behavior:
reliability_options.mc_n,mc_max_cv,mc_seed,mc_remove_oob. - Run toggles in analyze mode:
run_configuration.include_sorm,include_mc,mc_with_is.
Problem File Used
Source: Ang, A. H-S. and Tang, W. H., Probability Concepts in Engineering Planning and Design, Vol. II, Wiley, 1990, p. 368, Problem 6.10.
AT610Problem.py defines:
- Stochastic variables:
Y,Z,M - Distributions:
lognormal,lognormal,gumbelmax - Correlation:
corr(Y, Z) = 0.4 - Limit state:
R = Y * ZL = Mg = R - L
Extracted Results Worksheet Tables
The tables below are transcribed from the Results worksheet in AT610-5abe5.xlsx.
Header Information
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Problem | AT610 |
| Request ID | 726e0fa551e94093aa14f99b3d55abe5 |
| Run time | 00 min 01.58 sec |
FORM Results
| beta | pf | beta_count | hbeta_count | lsf_count | glsf_count | hlsf_count | nit | min_tries | min_method | lsf_mult | |---:|---:|---:|---:|---:|---:|---:|---:|---:|---| | 2.664 | 0.003857 | 15 | 15 | 7 | 6 | 6 | 10 | 1 | tr_interior_point |
SORM Results
| beta | pf | lsf_class | sor_method | sor_approx | sor_fit_meth | lsf_count |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.649 | 0.004035 | Hyperboloid | SOSPA_H | Taylor2 | AnalyticAll | 0 |
SORM LSF Fit Parameters
| sospa_a | sospa_b | sospa_c |
|---|---|---|
| 319.3 | -102.9 | -67.66 |
| 1.933e-12 | 1.552e-14 | |
| -295.0 | 18.55 |
SOSPA Diagnostics
| at_mean | ts | wh | uh | E3 | E4 | E5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| False | -0.005182 | -2.446 | -3.848 | -1.533 | 3.633 | -10.82 |
Stochastic Variable Inputs and FORM Failure Point Outputs
Input definitions (var_type, moments/parameters, and bounds):
| var_name | var_type | mean | std | param1 | param2 | lb | ub | truncated |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Y | LogNormal | 40 | 5 | 3.681 | 0.1245 | 0 | inf | False |
| Z | LogNormal | 50 | 2.5 | 3.911 | 0.04997 | 0 | inf | False |
| M | GumbelMax | 1000 | 200 | 910.0 | 155.9 | -inf | inf | False |
FORM output values at the failure point (x, z, u, alpha, importance):
| var_name | x | z | u | alpha | importance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Y | 33.78 | -1.294 | -1.294 | -0.4857 | -0.4307 |
| Z | 47.75 | -0.8947 | -0.4097 | -0.1538 | -0.1728 |
| M | 1613 | 2.293 | 2.293 | 0.8605 | 0.8858 |
User-Defined Correlation Inputs
| var 1 | var 2 | cor_x | cor_z |
|---|---|---|---|
| Y | Z | 0.4 | 0.4013 |
Monte Carlo Results
| beta | pf | cv | max_cv | size | %_removed | cycles | auto_size | mc_with_is |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.664 | 0.003857 | 0.02934 | 0.05 | 300000 | 0 | 3 | True | False |
Monte Carlo Variable Statistics and Correlations
| var_name | mean | std | %_oob | cor_x row | Y | Z | M |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Y | 40.01 | 5.009 | 0 | Y | 1.0 | 0.3967 | -0.002751 |
| Z | 50.0 | 2.503 | 0 | Z | 0.3967 | 1.0 | -0.00192 |
| M | 1001 | 200.4 | 0 | M | -0.002751 | -0.00192 | 1.0 |
Notes Reported by Reliafy
- Validation: Stochastic variables definition and limit state function validation required 8 function calls.
- Validation: SORM
sor_fit_methodwas changed fromnulltoAnalyticAllbecause the LSF returns both gradient and Hessian and is compatible with the other reliability options. - Validation: Validation of the limit state function's analytic gradient and Hessian required 34 function calls.
- FORM: Active bound multipliers reported for
Y,Z, andM. If large relative to Beta (2.664), try truncating the statistical distributions and check if the reliability index changes significantly. - Monte Carlo: Completed 3 cycles with
1.00e+05samples per cycle.
Interpretation Snapshot
- FORM and SORM are close (
beta ~ 2.664vs2.649), which is typically expected for a smooth, mildly nonlinear limit state. - Monte Carlo estimate (
beta ~ 2.664) is consistent with FORM/SORM and has acceptable precision (cv ~ 0.0293 < 0.05). - The sampled correlation matrix reproduces the intended
Y-Zcorrelation (target0.4, observed0.397).
Generated Figures
The PDF result file for this run is saved as results/2026-03-15/14-26-51/AT610-5abe5.pdf.
That PDF is composed of vector-based pages rather than embedded raster images, so the figures below are rendered from each PDF page and saved under docs/problem-authoring/images/.
Figure 1: Importance Factors

Figure 2: SOSPA Fit Functions

Figure 3: Monte Carlo Histogram for Y

Figure 4: Monte Carlo Histogram for Z

Figure 5: Monte Carlo Histogram for M

Figure 6: Histogram of Limit State Function Values

Figure 7: Histogram of Load and Resistance Values

Reproducing This Example
- Ensure
AT610Problem.pyexists inproblems/. - Run an analyze profile with SORM and MC enabled.
- Open the timestamped folder under
results/<date>/<time>/. - Use
*.xlsx(Resultsworksheet) for tabular summaries and*.jsonfor machine-readable values.
For this run specifically:
- Folder path:
results/2026-03-15/14-26-51/ - Request ID:
726e0fa551e94093aa14f99b3d55abe5 - Last-5 suffix used in file names:
5abe5